Stop Signposting the End of Your Piece
"In conclusion" and its cousins don't wrap up an ending — they just announce one is coming. Here's why that undercuts your writing, and what actually signals a close.
The Reader Already Knows It's Ending
Every reader can feel an ending coming before you announce it. The sentences get shorter. The examples stop piling up. The verbs slow down. That's the signal — not a label stapled to the front of the last paragraph. So when a piece of writing stops to say "in conclusion," it's doing the reader's job for them, badly, like a narrator who steps into frame to explain the joke that just landed.
The phrase shows up constantly in AI-drafted copy and in essays built on the old five-paragraph template, and for the same reason: both are optimizing for a checklist instead of a reader. The checklist says a paper needs an intro, three points, and a close, so the writer marks each section like a highway exit sign. Nobody taught them that the marking itself is the tell. A trained eye can spot the phrase from three paragraphs away and start skimming, because it knows exactly what's coming: a flat restatement of everything already said, delivered with less energy than the first pass.
Why the Label Backfires
Here's the mechanical problem. "In conclusion" spends a whole sentence — sometimes a whole paragraph — announcing that a summary is coming, instead of just delivering the summary. It's throat-clearing. Cut it and nothing is lost; the next sentence still makes sense, usually more sense, because it isn't waiting behind a doorman.
There's also a trust problem. A reader who's followed you for six hundred words doesn't need to be told the piece is wrapping up. They can count paragraphs. Telling them anyway reads as either padding for a word count or a nervous tic — writing that doesn't trust its own pacing to land the point, so it puts up a sign instead. Strip the sign and the writer is forced to make the ending actually work on its own, which is the harder and better exercise.
What the Phrase Costs You
| Signal | What it tells the reader | What to do instead |
|---|---|---|
| "In conclusion" | A summary is coming, brace yourself | Just give the summary |
| "To sum up" | I'm repeating myself now | Say the one thing that matters most |
| "At the end of the day" | I'm reaching for a cliché to sound wise | Say the plain version of the claim |
| "Overall, it is clear that" | I'm hedging behind a vague consensus | Name who is actually making this claim, and why |
Other Closers Worth Retiring
- In summary
- All in all
- As we have seen
- Last but not least
- With all that said
- It goes without saying
- Needless to say
Let the last section behave differently than the rest of the piece, without labeling the shift. Shorten your sentences. Trade a general claim for one sharp, specific detail. Answer the question the reader has been holding since paragraph two. Any of these signals "we're landing" without a single word saying so.
Before and After
A before-and-after makes the difference concrete.
Before: "In conclusion, remote work has changed how teams communicate, and companies need to adapt their policies to keep up with these new realities."
After: "Teams that used to solve problems by walking to someone's desk now solve them in a Slack thread with four people and no clear owner. The policies haven't caught up. Neither has anyone's calendar."
The second version doesn't announce that it's closing. It just closes — with a specific image and a small, dry observation instead of a summary of everything already said. Notice, too, that it's shorter. Endings rarely need more words than the paragraph before them; they need better-chosen ones.
Readers don't need a map of your structure. They need the last sentence to be worth reading twice.
Three Ways to Land an Ending Without a Sign
- 1Cut the announcement, read what's left
Delete the last paragraph's first sentence and see how it reads. Most of the time the paragraph starts stronger without the announcement, because the second sentence was already doing the actual work.
- 2Swap a summary for a specific case
Instead of restating your three points in the abstract, put the weight on one example, image, or number that carries all three at once.
- 3Match your rhythm to your point
Short, plain sentences read as certainty. If the ending is meant to feel resolved, let the sentence length say so before the words do.
What an Ending Should Still Do
None of this means an ending has to be clever or quotable. It means the ending should keep doing the piece's job — making a point, showing something, answering something — right up to the last word, instead of stepping outside to narrate its own structure. A summary sentence is fine. A summary sentence with a flashing sign taped to it is the part to lose. Most writers already know how to close a paragraph well; the habit of labeling it is what gets in the way, usually left over from a teacher who wanted proof the structure was followed.
If you're keeping a running list of closing lines that actually work when you notice them elsewhere, that's worth doing — it's a separate habit from the one this piece is about, but a useful one to build alongside it. Collecting good examples and cutting bad habits are two sides of the same practice; this piece is only about the second one.
Catching It Before Anyone Else Reads It
Most of this shows up first in early AI drafts, since models trained on those five-paragraph templates default to the same signposting, and a fast read-through rarely catches it because the phrase sounds polite rather than lazy. Running a stiff draft through AI Humanizer Lab's Humanizer tool is a quick way to catch a lingering "in conclusion" and similar leftover transitions before anyone else reads the piece, so the ending sounds like it was written by someone who trusted the reader to notice it was one.
Make your writing sound human
Humanize AI-generated text in one click with AI Humanizer Lab.
Try for free